被收养者对哈兰德与布拉金的看法

经过 Patrick Armstrong adopted from South Korea to the USA, Adoptee Speaker, Podcaster, and Community Facilitator, Co-Host of the 展池秀, Co-Founder of Asian Adoptees of Indiana

Today the Supreme Court will hear the case of Haaland v. Brackeen.

What’s at stake?

Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and potentially, other federal protections for Indigenous tribes.

Per the New York Times:

“The law was drafted to respond to more than a century of Native children’s being forcibly removed from tribal homes by social workers, sent to government and missionary boarding schools and then placed in white Christian homes.

The law’s goal of reunification — placing Native children with tribal families — has long been a gold standard, according to briefs signed by more than two dozen child welfare organizations.

Building a Native child’s connection to extended family, cultural heritage and community through tribal placement, they said, is inherent in the definition of “the best interests of the child” and a critical stabilizing factor when the child exits or ages out of foster care.”

👇🏼

The Brackeens are fighting this law because in 2015 they fostered, then adopted, a Navajo child and they, along with other families, believe it should be easier to adopt Indigenous children.

The defence posits that “the law discriminates against Native American children as well as non-Native families who want to adopt them because it determines placements based on race.” 🫠🫠🫠

☝🏼 It’s not lost on me that this case is being heard in November, which is both National Adoptee Awareness Month AND Native American Heritage Month.

✌🏼 This case is majorly indicative of the systemic issues oppressing Indigenous communities and invalidating adoptee experiences.

White folks who want to adopt need to understand this simple fact:

YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SOMEONE ELSE’S CHILD.

Especially a child of the global majority.

⭐️ Fostering or adopting us does not automatically make you a good person.

⭐️ Fostering or adopting us does not “save us” from anything.

⭐️ Believing you are entitled to adopt or foster anyone’s child is the definition of privilege.

If the Brackeens and their co-plaintiffs poured this much time, energy, and effort into supporting Indigenous families and communities as they have trying to overturn constitutional law, who knows how many families could have been preserved?

On that note, why are we not actively working to preserve families?

🧐 That’s the question this month: Why not family preservation?

You can follow Patrick at Insta: @patrickintheworld or at LinkedIn @Patrick Armstrong

资源

Supreme Court hears case challenging who can adopt Indigeous children

Listen Live: Supreme Court hears cases on adoption law intended to protect Native American families

Challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act

How an Evangelical Couple’s SCOTUS Case Could affect Native American Children

The Supreme Court will decide the future of the Indian Child Welfare Act

Jena Martin’s 文章 that looks at the differences and similarities between the ICWA and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption

我对收养的看法随着时间而改变

经过 玛丽亚弗雷德里克森 收养人和 艺术家 从韩国到瑞典。

我永远不会确切地知道我是如何、何时甚至是否被发现的。我在这一页上的作品展示了我是如何决定创建自己的场景的,我将东亚小女孩与典型的北欧风景混合在一起。

今年我就五十岁了。在这 50 年的 7 年零 4 个月里,我从另一个角度看待收养问题,这与我最初 42 年的看法不同,这是我在 2022 年的头几个小时里思考的问题。

在批评收养时,您经常会听到有人反驳您指的是其他不同意您的批评观点的收养者。 “我有一个被收养的朋友,她非常高兴和感激”。嗯,所以?

另一件经常让我印象深刻的事情是,在收养方面,年长和经验丰富并不会让你更受尊重。不知道有多少次看到成年被收养人被养父母推回去,声称他们十岁的养子从未经历过种族歧视或感到无根等等。

多年来,我一直支持领养,我什至参加了领养机构为准领养父母和社会工作者举办的信息(宣传)会议。我从未被质疑过,也从未被要求出示其他科学来源的统计数据来支持我的主张。那时我被收养了,现在我也一样被收养了。然而,我当时的话从未受到质疑,而我今天所说的话总是受到审查,并且经常被视为感伤的 BS 而被驳回。与真正感伤的 BS 不同……

那时候,我还没有读过任何关于领养的报道,也没有看过任何纪录片。除了我的兄弟姐妹和收养机构会议小组中的其他被收养人外,我几乎没有和其他被收养人交谈过。当然,今天有人可以指责我有点直言不讳,但为什么我以前没有被指责呢?为什么快五十岁的自己的话比三十岁的自己的话更不可信,或者十五岁的自己……

这不仅仅是关于创伤。对我来说,它是关于政治/意识形态的陈述,是关于特权和殖民/父权结构的见解,我今天对这些的了解比十年前要多得多,更不用说小时候了。

我认为这与收养的构思和演员方式有关。我们,被收养者永远是孩子,因此彼此平等,但与养父母不平等,即使你比你正在辩论的养父母大几十岁。因此,在收养辩论的背景下,我讨厌被贴上“养子”的标签,我不喜欢不得不将收养的人称为养父母。在这种情况下,如果我们是被收养者和收养者,我会更愿意这样做,但由于我知道要选择什么样的战斗,所以我确实尊重收养论坛中的团体规则。但是,我确实相信语言很重要。文字描绘图画,而这些图画会影响对话的进行方式。

简体中文
%%页脚%%